5 Day Forecast

63°

Tonight 54°

Tomorrow 72°/48°

Letter: Limiting gun rights good sense

11 Comments | Leave a Comment

A recent letter-writer produced a cogent, clear and accurate historical reference to the carrying of concealed and loaded weapons in public places. The Second Amendment permitted a well-regulated militia and the right of the people to bear arms largely in consideration of the tattered remnants of citizen-soldiers of the Continental Army.

Our fledgling country was in a different time and place when the Second Amendment was passed; it needed citizen-soldiers. It is very unlikely the Congress of 1781 was able to comprehend the carrying of weapons into malls and stores and public gatherings of any kind just because a gun nut thinks it might keep him safe in societal situations he is by his own actions making unsafe.

Another letter-writer wants “facts to support the condemnation” of concealed weapons in public places and examples of incidents involving guns in public places. How about this one: a local gun nut discharged his loaded and concealed handgun in the local Walmart. By the grace of God no one was hit, but he undeniably put Walmart customers in jeopardy. Discharging a loaded gun in a public place, accidental or intentional, should have disqualified him from ever owning a handgun again. I hope it did. Careless persons with no better sense than to carry a loaded gun into a public place are a danger to the public.

No one who is not a law enforcement professional should be permitted to carry a gun in public places. No one who is not on a police department Special Weapons and Tactics team should be allowed access to an assault rifle. Hunters do not need assault weapons, and gangs should not have access to them. Any person in possession of an assault weapon should be arrested on site.

When The Daily Advance recently took an informal poll of six residents regarding stricter gun laws limiting gun purchase and use, five of six local residents polled were in favor of stricter gun laws. Yes, let the people decide. And when they do, we will have saner gun laws.

MARTHA A. JOHNSONSFlbElizabeth City

Comments

I totally support your letter Ms. Johnson

In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts it is against the law to carry a gun that is not registered in the Commonwealth. Penalty for violation of this law is a mandatory one month jail charge plus seizure of the gun. No trial necessary. If this law was in affect in our city and carried out, I wonder how many of our local pedestrians would be in jail.

Amen webo.

Amen webo.

yet another willing to sacrifice our freedoms...

I would argue that we need citizen soldiers just as much today... In the event I need to defend my family and there is no time to wait for law enforcement, I'm equipped to do so. That is my right and responsibility as a father, husband and citizen.

Who are you to deny me that freedom? I'm only a threat to those who would harm my family or my neighbors... how dare you lump me and my fellow responsible law abiding gun owners into the same category as gang members? As Thomas Jefferson said, "Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not"...

Constitution

There is a process to amend the constitution. If you think the "gun nuts" are outnumbered 5-1 you should have no problem following the process.

The people always decide.

One last thought. The beauty of this country is that we always let the people decide. That certainly doesn't mean they always make the right decision.

Martha missed a great seminar.

I wish Mrs. Johnson had attended the very informative lecture on the history of the Second Amendment and current gun control recently presented by attorneys John Morrison and Chris Rahilly. If she had, I bet she would think differently.

Lets Follow Your Logic Ms Johnson

Alcohol is responsible for far more deaths than guns- maybe we should outlaw booze. One drink and loose driving privileges for life. Oh, tried that. Did not work as advertised.

How do you propose to get guns out of the hands of gangs? House to house search? Search all houses or just the ones you "think" belong to gangs?

In 1781 people carried guns everywhere, when they were afraid of attack from Indians or highwaymen (thugs). Even to church.

Have you noticed that the mass killings occurred at "white, middle class" schools where no one has a gun? Shooters do not walk into an integrated school. Because the students will shoot back.

Five of six people in a TDA poll is a poor judge of how people would actually vote. Communities that put it to the vote, usually vote in favor of private gun ownership and concealed carry.

I'm not trying to be a smart butt Ms J. This is a complicated issue.

Thanks Jorge!

Jorge, you have made my day! "Shooters do not walk into an integrated school. Because the students will shoot back." Maybe the trio of students who were arrested this past week for illegal concealed carry of a firearm at a school function are to be congratulated and encouraged. I had never thought of it that way. Thanks Jorge! :)

Gangs

You do realize that gang members don't just godown to their local gun store to buy assault rifles don't you? They are the ones buying them illegally. Dumb ass, restricting gun sales only prevents non felons from purchasing guns.

Really Dildonius?

You really felt the need to call someone a "dumb ass" for writing a letter you disagree with? You know that the letter writer does not work for the Daily Advance. She is just a citizen who wrote an opinion to the paper.

Gun nut?

What clever wordplay the writer of this article has used. Man, I bet that you had to break out the thesaurus for this one. Nobody respects a writer who uses terms like "gun nut." It is childish, petty, and only serves to anger the people who make up the other side of the argument. The second amendment was written so that Americans would have the means to protect themselves from their government in the event that the government becomes too corrupt, and a new one needs to be established. When the second amendment is viewed from this angle it would make sense to say that any and all law abiding Americans should have access to the same high tech and extremely deadly weapons that the military uses. So, were you always into tabloid style journalism, or is this just a new ploy to sella few more papers or get a few extra hits on your website.

Ignominiously yours

Tyler

Add comment

Login or register to post comments
Sponsored Links
Do You Carry Concealed?
Learn to Protect & Defend Yourself! Join the US Concealed Carry Assoc.
USConcealedCarry.net

Ask a Lawyer: Gun Rights
24 Lawyers Are Online. Questions Answered Every 9 Seconds.
eAnswer.com/Law/Gun-Rights

National Gun Control Poll
Should GOP cave on Obama's Gun Control Plan? Be Heard Now!
IndependentLivingNews.com/GunPoll

Fight against socialism
Protect your second amendment rights, laugh at leftists and get info.
http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogs

WDYT? Gilchrist’s successor